If your team ships features, captures learning in docs, and pays off technical debt each sprint, you compound returns. We provide a simple checklist you can run on repeat.
Ship three outcomes with one effort
The fastest way to get durable AI leverage is to braid three outcomes into every sprint:
- Product value: A shipped feature, workflow, or improvement that a user benefits from today.
- Learning: A short, durable write-up capturing what worked, what failed, and why.
- System improvement: A small upgrade to tooling, data quality, evaluation, or infra that makes the next sprint cheaper and faster.
You don’t need big bets or moonshots. You need a weekly loop that compounds.
The weekly loop (repeatable)
-
Pick one outcome users will feel
- Example: “Reduce onboarding ticket handle time by 20% with an agent-assisted checklist.”
- Write the success metric and verification method up front.
-
Ground with the smallest context that can work
- Identify the single source of truth (runbook, API, dataset) and the exact fields/commands you’ll use.
- Avoid broad search on the first iteration.
-
Design the minimal loop
- Plan → Ground → Act → Check → Summarize.
- Prefer deterministic tools and idempotent operations. Add a hard budget (steps, time, tokens).
-
Ship behind a flag
- Gate with environment config or a feature flag. Start with internal users.
-
Instrument ruthlessly
- Log prompts, tool calls, outputs, checks, and final artifacts as a transcript ID.
- Capture latency, token usage, success/fail reason.
-
Write the 400–700 word learning
- What hypotheses did you test? What failed? What’s your new belief?
-
Pay one debt item
- Stabilize a flaky tool, add a missing check, clean up a prompt, or improve chunking.
-
Demo + decide
- Show the artifact, review metrics, decide whether to widen the flag, and queue the next debt item.
Definition of Done (copy/paste)
- A user-facing change is merged and deployable (flagged is fine)
- Success metric captured with before/after (screenshot, table, or log sample)
- Transcript or run summary attached (prompts, tools, outputs, checks)
- 1–2 paragraph learning added to the knowledge base
- Exactly one small debt ticket closed (tooling, eval, data, or prompt hygiene)
Templates you can steal
PR template (agent/AI work)
Title: [Feature/Workflow] — impact + guardrails Problem - Who benefits and how will we know? Approach - Plan → tools → checks → budgets - Flags and scopes (what can it touch?) Verification - Expected diffs / artifacts - Unit/integration checks and manual spot-check steps Observability - Log keys, transcript ID format, dashboards/links Risks & Rollback - What would we revert and how?
Run summary (paste in your docs)
Run: agent-onboarding-checklist Date: 2025-06-22 Owner: @you Change: Assisted checklist reduces handle time Inputs - Ticket type: onboarding - Data: CRM v3, fields [company_size, plan, region] Outcomes - Lead time: 11m → 6m (median) - Rework rate: 23% → 12% - Cost/run: $0.08 tokens + $0.01 infra Notes - Two failures due to missing region mapping; added a guard + fallback to manual.
Debt ticket (tiny, done-in-a-day)
Title: Add 2xx/shape check to CRM API tool Scope - Only tool: crm.getCustomer(id) - Add schema check for { id, plan, region } Why now - 12% of failures were schema drift; this removes a class of silent errors.
AI-specific adoption guidelines
- Autonomy levels: Start at Draft‑only → Constrained execution → Supervised writes → Trusted tasks. Graduate per workflow, not globally.
- Verification first: Prefer exact predicates (tests, schemas, allowed diffs). Use LLM self‑checks as advisory, fail closed when uncertain.
- Tooling quality: Make tools idempotent with dry‑run modes and explicit scopes (file globs, resource allowlists).
- Context discipline: Pull just enough context; resist “search everything.” Add retrieval later with evaluations.
- Budgets: Enforce max steps, tokens, and wall clock time. Log budget exits distinctly.
- Observability: Every action ties to a transcript ID. Keep structured JSON logs and one-click drilldowns.
- Privacy + provenance: Do not send secrets; redact by default. Tag data sources and versions in outputs.
What to build first (high signal)
- Template PRs: Safe, repeatable edits across many files with tests.
- Operational runbooks: Restart/check/service sanity flows with clear success criteria.
- Structured reporting: Weekly tables from APIs with deltas and short notes.
- Context packers: Small functions to assemble the exact inputs a workflow needs.
Avoid first: open‑ended research, subjective copywriting, or anything requiring broad crawling.
Metrics that prove compounding return
| Metric | Before | After (Week 1) | Target |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lead time to artifact (median) | 18m | 10m | 6m |
| Rework rate | 28% | 18% | <10% |
| Cost per successful run | $0.19 | $0.12 | $0.08 |
| Weekly active users (internal) | 4 | 7 | 12 |
Track by workflow. Promote when the numbers stabilize for two consecutive weeks.
RACI for a small team
- Product — Accountable for outcome metric and flag rollout plan.
- Engineer — Responsible for tools, checks, and guardrails.
- Data/ML — Consulted on evaluation design and drift alerts.
- Support/Ops — Informed; provides feedback from real use.
4‑week rollout plan
Week 1: Ship the smallest loop behind a flag, add transcript logging, define success metric.
Week 2: Cut rework in half with one debt fix, publish the first learning note, widen to 3–5 internal users.
Week 3: Add an evaluation or schema check, reduce latency, and enable supervised writes for the single workflow.
Week 4: Lock in dashboards, document runbooks, and graduate that workflow to “trusted” if numbers hold.
Common pitfalls (and fixes)
- Big‑bang projects → Replace with small weekly loops that ship.
- Prompt spaghetti → Centralize prompts, add owners, and prune monthly.
- Ambiguous success → Define the metric up front and report it in every demo.
- No audit trail → Store transcripts with stable IDs and link them in PRs.
- Skipping verification → Add one exact predicate now; fancy evals can wait.
A one‑page weekly checklist
- Define 1 user‑felt outcome and the success metric
- Assemble minimal context and deterministic tools
- Implement the smallest loop with budgets and a transcript ID
- Ship behind a flag to a small audience
- Capture before/after and a short run summary
- Close one debt ticket that reduces future rework
- Demo and decide: widen, refine, or stop
See also
- Beyond autocomplete → agent loops that do real work: /blog/beyond-autocomplete
- Build a RAG search for your blog: /blog/rag-for-your-blog-open-source
- A reference coding agent architecture: /blog/build-a-coding-agent-ts
Closing thought
Pragmatic AI adoption is disciplined shipping. Tie product value, learning, and system improvement together every week, and the compounding starts to take care of itself.